On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:37:11AM +0100, Klaus Naumann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've done some bonnie++ tests and everything looks good IMHO.
> See attachments (new_speed is with lolo's patch and old_speed without).
> I vote for commit. Cool work !
It looks like this is statistical distortion as some numbers went up.
It looks at least that there is no real difference ...
> Version 1.02 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
> -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
> Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
> ivy 368M 1415 95 2437 7 1003 4 1208 81 2298 6 90.7 2
> ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
> -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
> files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
> 16 235 99 +++++ +++ 13871 98 242 99 +++++ +++ 898 99
> ivy,368M,1415,95,2437,7,1003,4,1208,81,2298,6,90.7,2,16,235,99,+++++,+++,13871,98,242,99,+++++,+++,898,99
> Version 1.02 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
> -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
> Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
> ivy 368M 1348 91 2468 7 836 3 1297 87 2178 5 91.0 2
> ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
> -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
> files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
> 16 220 99 +++++ +++ 13440 98 232 99 +++++ +++ 780 99
> ivy,368M,1348,91,2468,7,836,3,1297,87,2178,5,91.0,2,16,220,99,+++++,+++,13440,98,232,99,+++++,+++,780,99
I would commit that too with some additional comments that the HPC
is capable of doing scatter-gather but this does not mix with the wd33
framwork which has no support for that.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5201-669912
Nine nineth on september the 9th Welcome to the new billenium
PGP signature
