Re: PATCH: Handle Linux/mips (Re: Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:51:42AM -0800, H . J . Lu wrote:

> > > How about this patch?
> > 
> > Looks good to me except that checking for __MIPSE[LB]__ should be
> > sufficient.  Anything that doesn't provide these two symbols wouldn't
> > have the chance of a snowball in hell to work.
> > 
> 
> I added those just in case someone wants to use a different compiler
> to bootstrap gcc on Linux/mips :-). I don't think it will hurt anyhing.

Sure, it won't.  And those guys who don't use a Linux/MIPS compiler seem
to be decieded to have _alot_ of extra fun anyway :-)

  Ralf

[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux