Re: 2.4.16 success on Indy (was Re: 2.4.16 success on Decstation 5000/150)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>
Subject: Re: 2.4.16 success on Indy (was Re: 2.4.16 success on Decstation 5000/150)
From: Ian Chilton <ian@ichilton.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 16:19:21 +0000
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <20011203143734.A5965@paradigm.rfc822.org>; from flo@rfc822.org on Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 02:37:34PM +0100
References: <20011203000338.A30090@paradigm.rfc822.org> <20011203000036.A10356@buzz.ichilton.local> <20011203143734.A5965@paradigm.rfc822.org>
Reply-to: Ian Chilton <ian@ichilton.co.uk>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.13i

Hello,

> It basically comes up for me but is endlessly slow because i am getting
> a mad interrupt - Putting an printk("I%d", irq) into do_IRQ shows 
> IRQ 8 going mad ...


Interesting. Does anyone know what IRQ 8 is?


Thanks

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.4.16 success on Indy (was Re: 2.4.16 success on Decstation5000/150)
  - From: Ladislav Michl

References:
- 2.4.16 success on Decstation 5000/150
  - From: Florian Lohoff
- 2.4.16 success on Indy (was Re: 2.4.16 success on Decstation 5000/150)
  - From: Ian Chilton
- Re: 2.4.16 success on Indy (was Re: 2.4.16 success on Decstation 5000/150)
  - From: Florian Lohoff

Prev by Date: Re: 2.4.16 success on Indy (was Re: 2.4.16 success on Decstation 5000/150)
Next by Date: Re: 2.4.16 success on Indy (was Re: 2.4.16 success on Decstation5000/150)
Previous by thread: Re: 2.4.16 success on Indy (was Re: 2.4.16 success on Decstation 5000/150)
Next by thread: Re: 2.4.16 success on Indy (was Re: 2.4.16 success on Decstation5000/150)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux MIPS Home] [LKML Archive] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux] [Git] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams]

Powered by Linux