On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 07:18:10AM +0100, Karsten Merker wrote: > > > How can the RM200 port be wrong endianess - The RM200 is bi-endian > > > thus any endianess would be ok (As long as the port does not assume > > > a specific endianess except the prom stuff). > > Unfortunately the firmware functions are different between little- and > big-endian firmware and there are quite some parts in the RM200 support > which currently do not work (and some even do not compile) on a big-endian > machine due to missing (correct) definitions. Another problem regarding > the big endian firmware is that nobody seems to have documentation about > it, not even a function vector table. As I understand the big endian firmware is just yet another ARC firmware implementation with some support for old MIPS firmware style vector tables. Ralf
