>>>>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 19:25:30 +1100, Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> said: ralf> It get's atomicity wrong. I suggest to make such statistics a ralf> per thread thing. That'll not only solve the SMP issues but ralf> also make sure processes running in parallel won't influence the ralf> result. Thank you for the comment. Yes, my patch provides "CPU" statistics (not "thread" statistics). Counting per thread might be useful in some case, but counting globally (like "unaligned_instructions" or "ll_ops" counter) is enough for me. --- Atsushi Nemoto
