Re: vmalloc bugs in 2.4.5???

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 10:39:47AM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
>
> > In 2.4.5, flush_cache_all() (and flush_tlb_all()) is called in
> > vmalloc_area_pages().  I think this call protect us from virtual
> > aliasing problem.
> >
> > By the way, does anybody have any problem with vmalloc on recent
> > kernel?
> >
> > In somewhere between 2.4.6 and 2.4.9, the call to flush_cache_all()
> > disappered from vmalloc_area_pages().  I have a data corruption
> > problem in vmalloc()ed area without this call.  I think we still need
> > this call.
>
> Entirely correct.  I'm just trying to find why this call got removed
> in 2.4.10.  Clearly wrong;  I had not noticed that these two lines
> got removed and thus was assuming the code of those two must somehow
> be malfunctioning.

I have added these two lines to vmalloc_area_pages in 2.4.10,but the
problems  still appear.
Why?

machael



[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux