On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 09:32:58AM +0200, Tom Appermont wrote: > Can someone explain me why start and end parameters are ignored in > r4k_flush_cache_range_d32i32() and cache range flushing operations > for other platforms? Afair the reason was that most invokations cover a range that is larger than the entire cache anyway so our implementation in practice doesn't cause any harm. Ralf
