Re: Benchmark performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Atsushi Nemoto <nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp>
Subject: Re: Benchmark performance
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 20:27:34 +0200
Cc: carstenl@mips.com, wgowcher@yahoo.com, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <20010824.180632.39150208.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp>; from nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp on Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 06:06:32PM +0900
References: <20010816111803.A17469@bacchus.dhis.org> <3B7BA970.56192BB8@mips.com> <20010816131422.B17970@bacchus.dhis.org> <20010824.180632.39150208.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 06:06:32PM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:

> ralf> I'm just about to put it into CVS.
> 
> Please apply this small patch...

Thanks, applied.  Somtimes the effects of C semantics are surprising ...

  Ralf

References:
- Re: Benchmark performance
  - From: Ralf Baechle
- Re: Benchmark performance
  - From: Carsten Langgaard
- Re: Benchmark performance
  - From: Ralf Baechle
- Re: Benchmark performance
  - From: Atsushi Nemoto

Prev by Date: Re: arch/mips/pci* stuff
Next by Date: RE: glibc 2.0.6 building problem.
Previous by thread: Re: Benchmark performance
Next by thread: Re: Problem with PMAD-AA / DECStation 5000/200
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux MIPS Home] [LKML Archive] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux] [Git] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams]

Powered by Linux