Re: OSS CVS Tree and 2.5.x

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Phil Thompson <Phil.Thompson@pace.co.uk>
Subject: Re: OSS CVS Tree and 2.5.x
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 13:21:25 +0200
Cc: "'linux-mips@oss.sgi.com'" <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
In-reply-to: <54045BFDAD47D5118A850002A5095CC30AC542@exchange1.cam.pace.co.uk>; from Phil.Thompson@pace.co.uk on Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:09:43AM +0100
References: <54045BFDAD47D5118A850002A5095CC30AC542@exchange1.cam.pace.co.uk>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:09:43AM +0100, Phil Thompson wrote:

> I wasn't around the last time this would have happened...
> 
> What happens to the OSS tree when 2.5.x gets started? Will 2.4.x and 2.5.x
> both be maintained on separate branches?

Yes.

  Ralf

References:
- OSS CVS Tree and 2.5.x
  - From: Phil Thompson

Prev by Date: Re: sti() does not work.
Next by Date: Re: RTLinux for Mips
Previous by thread: OSS CVS Tree and 2.5.x
Next by thread: linux 2.4.5: sysmips(MIPS_ATOMIC_SET) is broken (yep, again...)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux MIPS Home] [LKML Archive] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux] [Git] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams]

Powered by Linux