On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 12:23:29PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > extern __inline__ void __sti(void) > > { > > __asm__ __volatile__( > > ".set\tnoreorder\n\t" > > ".set\tnoat\n\t" > > "mfc0\t$1,$12\n\t" > > "ori\t$1,0x1f\n\t" > > "xori\t$1,0x1e\n\t" > > "mtc0\t$1,$12\n\t" /* <----- problem here! */ > > Here should follow some nop's on a MIPS I system to make sure $12 > is written There are no nops there since we simply don't care how how many cycles after the mtc0 the interrupts actually get enabled. Worst case is the R4000's 8 stage pipeline where we have a latency of 3 cycles, clearly nothing that justifies wasting memory and cycles for nops. > (why is noreorder used here?). Without the .set noreorder the assembler would be free to do arbitrary reordering of the object code generated. Gas doesn't do that but there are other assemblers that do flow analysis and may generate object code that doesn't look very much like the source they were fed with. Ralf