Maciej, "Maciej W. Rozycki" wrote: > > Ralf, I think it should get applied unless someone cooks up a better > solution, i.e. optimizes it. I'll optimize it myself, eventually, if no > one else does, but don't hold your breath. > Great! Optimized memmove is in todos of several MIPS developers. Considering your patch and my investigation though, it's not showstopper. In fact, there are a few places that call memmove, all of them aren't on "common path". However, I would consider that common path certainly depends on the way Linux is used. I may imagine the configuration where the bug may trigger. Perhaps, eliminating that known "horror fix" (you know) is more important. Regards, Gleb.
