On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:44:28PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > The point is whether addresses should be extended at all if a 32-bit > target is selected. IMHO -- not, that's a limitation of BFD when > configured for both a 32-bit and a 64-bit target and it should be fixed > sooner or later (at least it's on my to-do list for some time). BFD is > free to handle addresses as it likes internally, be it 64-bit or 32-bit, > but they should be truncated on final output to a 32-bit target, as they > already are for certain cases. Agreed, that'd be much more readable for humans. For processing by software having some canonical form, that is 64-bit would be a bit more handy though. Ralf
