Re: MIPS_ATOMIC_SET again (Re: newest kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Maciej W. Rozycki" wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 28 May 2001, Kevin D. Kissell wrote:
> 
> > Use a global variable testable by the inline code?
> 
>  With both variants inlined?  Now that's really ugly.

I think system V requires _test_and_set() being included in the libsys dynamic
library.  Does Linux want to be sysv compatible?  If so, we should removed the
inlined _test_and_set().

> 
> > >  Are vr41xx plain ISA I or crippled ISA II+ CPUs?
> >
> > Actually, they are crippled MIPS III+ 64-bit CPUs
> 
>  Then an ll/sc and lld/scd emulation seems to be most appropriate here.  I
> don't think we want to add _test_and_set() to mips64*-linux.
> 

64 bit is a overkill for the pityful vr41xx CPUs.

The need for kernel emulated test_and_set() in 64bit kernel is not obvious
yet, and hopefully will never come.

Jun


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux