Re: [PATCH] incorrect asm constraints for ll/sc constructs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 25 May 2001, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> How about the attached, then?  If the p[0x100000] case is of sufficient
> concern, we can work around that too, but this catches all current
> uses.

 Fine for me.  Don't worry of the gcc bug -- such large offests are rare
and I doubt anyone will get hurt.  Hopefully gcc will get fixed meanwhile,
either by me or by someone else.

-- 
+  Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland   +
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+        e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available        +



[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux