Re: MIPS_ATOMIC_SET again (Re: newest kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:

> On Thu, 24 May 2001, Kevin D. Kissell wrote:
> 
> 
>>>  First, we are talking about glibc and not the entire userland.
>> 
>> But since essentially the entire userland is linked with glibc,
>> I'm not sure how much that distinction matters, in practical
>> terms.
> 
> 
>  Do you link statically?  If not, then almost no code from glibc is
> incorporated into your binaries, with an unimportant exception of a few
> functions from libc_nonshared.
> 

and those pesky little inlined code snippets...

#define PT_EI extern inline

PT_EI long int
testandset (int *spinlock)

which of course uses ll/sc if your world is built for _MIPS_ISA >= 
_MIPS_ISA_MIPS2


This can be fixed, of course. 

-- 
Joe deBlaquiere
Red Hat, Inc.
307 Wynn Drive
Huntsville AL, 35805
voice : (256)-704-9200
fax   : (256)-837-3839



[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux