On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 11:32:03AM -0700, Scott A McConnell wrote: > Which is correct? > 1 or 2 parameters ? > The first comes from a 2.4.0 kernel and the second from a 2.4.2 > extracted from cvs a few days ago. 1 Parameter; I changed the functions since about half the calls in the kernel code did show that whoever wrote the code didn't understand what the function is supposed to do. - set_cp0_status(bits) Set all the bits described by the bitmask bits in the status register. - clear_cp0_status(bits) Clear all the bits set in the bitmask argument bits in the status register. - change_cp0_status(change, set) Set all bits which are set in the bitmask change to the value given by the bitmask set; all other bits stay unchanged. This is the same as the old set_cp0_status function. Most people want to use {set,clear}_cp0_status(). Ralf