Re: Recommended toolchain

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 04:39:34PM +0200, Houten K.H.C. van (Karel) wrote:
> IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP
> IP: routing cache hash table of 2048 buckets, 16Kbytes
> TCP: Hash tables configured (established 16384 bind 16384)
> Unhandled kernel unaligned access in unaligned.c:emulate_load_store_insn, line 372:
> $0 : 00000000 10010c00 8017fed0 00000000
> $4 : 801fe33c 80200000 813de000 802db000
> $8 : 10010c01 8019af20 00000000 00000000
> $12: 00000000 fffff000 fffffff7 802db060
> $16: 00000000 813de000 00000001 00000000
> $20: 00000005 801cbe34 801eb070 801eb1ac
> $24: 00000000 0000000a
> $28: 8022e000 8022fe88 00000000 80066cc0
> epc   : 8017ff08
> Status: 10010c03
> Cause : 00002010
> Process swapper (pid: 1, stackpage=8022e000)
> 
> etc.
> I have not yet found the time to look further into that...

Guido did that last weekend and discovered that this is a toolchain
problem which disappears when compiling with gcc 3.0

Flo
-- 
Florian Lohoff                  flo@rfc822.org             +49-5201-669912
     Why is it called "common sense" when nobody seems to have any?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux