On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 01:10:27PM +1000, Liam Davies wrote: > in terms of instruction encodings. I would have thought the cpu would have > crapped out when it hit bad instructions. So it would seem the > exceptions were occurring but the code that it was executing wasn't even code. > Hence my assumption that we never got a TLB refill., even though the fault > handler was being called. Probably somewhere in the garbage there was another memory reference which resulted in a second TLB exception, at that time a store to 0x10004f4c which then got handled via the general exception handler and resulted in do_page_fault being called. Ralf
