Re: [FIX] sysmips(MIPS_ATMIC_SET, ...) ret_from_sys_call vs. o32_ret_from_sys_call

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Ralf Baechle wrote:

> Sorry, the specs is code and docs I have access to here inside SGI and which
> I cannot pass on ...

 Hmm, weird -- I thought a manual page would be available somewhere, as
it's practised in Unix.  Error conditions is what would be most
interesting.

> We have an IRIX 5 emulation and if I remember right for IRIX 5
> MIPS_ATOMIC_SET is still supported, so we need to also.  So I fear we'll
> have to keep sysmips.  Which still doesn't mean we should come up with
> something better.

 OK, then, but still we should do it properly, even for MIPS1.

-- 
+  Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland   +
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+        e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available        +



[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux