>
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 05:39:40PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>
> > > Wouldnt be this correct ? Realsize is size - holes.
> > >
> > > Index: mm/page_alloc.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > RCS file: /cvs/linux/mm/page_alloc.c,v
> > > retrieving revision 1.49
> > > diff -u -r1.49 page_alloc.c
> > > --- mm/page_alloc.c 2001/01/11 04:02:45 1.49
> > > +++ mm/page_alloc.c 2001/01/16 16:26:55
> > > @@ -824,7 +824,7 @@
> > > if (zholes_size)
> > > realsize -= zholes_size[j];
> > >
> > > - printk("zone(%lu): %lu pages.\n", j, size);
> > > + printk("zone(%lu): %lu pages.\n", j, realsize);
> > > zone->size = size;
> > > zone->name = zone_names[j];
> > > zone->lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
> >
> > It look reasonable but is it what was really intended? You should ask
> > the author or linux-kernel, I suppose.
>
> Which probably is Kanoj who is subscribed to this list.
>
> Ralf
>
realsize is fine, and that is what it is in Linus' tree. We want
to report actual number of pages, not number of pages including
the holes in memory.
Kanoj
