On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 05:43:24PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > > What's wrong with cacheflush(addr, count, which) that actually checks if > > > <addr; addr+count> lies within the caller's address space before > > > performing the flush and returns -EPERM otherwise? It would make the > > > caller crawl like a turtle if it wished to but it would leave other > > > processes alone. > > > > cacheflush(2) actually is supposed to handle things that way. > > Didn't I write it clearly-enough? ;-) return -EOVERBLOODINCAFFEIN; Ralf
