Re: MIPS_ATOMIC_SET in sys_sysmips()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Harald Koerfgen wrote:

> Another possibility would be to rely on the userland ll/sc emulation in the
> kernel. The one in the linux-vr tree seems to be working well and can easily be
> backported to Linux/MIPS.

 This should work but it looks ugly to me and the performance would suck
horribly. 

> Advantage: userland binary compatibility.
> Disadvantage: possibility for a lot of context switches for userland atomic
> operations.

 We may implement the emulation anyway, just like we emulate unaligned
accesses. 

> Having a sysmips(MIPS_ATOMIC_SET, ...) or atomic_op() solution would probably a
> lot faster.
> 
> Maybe we should implement both :)

 If we could afford another syscall number then I would prefer atomic_op() 
at the moment as it is well-documented and it does not overload one
function for various purposes, i.e. it's a bit faster. 

  Maciej

-- 
+  Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland   +
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+        e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available        +



[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux