le 29.11.2008 15:07 Klaus Rechert a écrit:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure if your patch is correct. What is the exact output? If
> there is something wrong then the methodcall() abstraction needs to be
> fixed.
what was wrong is that methodcall() was not called and the output was
"$%s->skewXTo(%f);\n", fname, skew
whatever the outgoing language was and something like
"$xxx->skewXTo(123);" is not a python statement...
With the patch, I get a correct python syntax : "xxx.skewXTo(123);"
(even if the ; is totally unnecessary...)
>
> Thanks for helping MING!
>
> Klaus
>> Here a patch for the skewXTo not generated correctly in python. It is
>> based on the code from 0.4.2 distribution :
>>
>> 337c337
>> < printf ("%s(%f);\n", methodcall (fname, "skewXTo"), skew);
>> ---
>> > printf ("$%s->skewXTo(%f);\n", fname, skew);
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
>> challenge
>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win
>> great prizes
>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the
>> world
>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ming-users mailing list
>> Ming-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ming-users
>>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Ming-users mailing list
Ming-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ming-users
