On 14.04.11 08:59, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> ext Klaus Umbach <klaus-maemo@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > upstart: PreDepends: sysvinit-utils (>= 2.86.ds1-23) or
> > busybox (>= 3:1.6.1.legal-1osso8) but it is not going to be installed
> >
> > ii busybox 3:1.10.2.legal-1osso Tiny utilities for small and embedded systems
> >
> > Why can't I install upstart?
>
> The busybox package might conflict somehow indirectly with upstart and
> apt plans to remove it. Try this to get different output:
>
> apt-get install busybox upstart
OK, this does not lower the weirdness-level:
n900:~# apt-get install busybox upstart
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
busybox is already the newest version.
upstart is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
n900:~# apt-get install upstart
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
upstart is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
n900:~# dpkg -l upstart
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Description
+++-====================-====================-========================================================
ii upstart 0.3.8-67+0m5 event-based init daemon
n900:~#
Why does dist-upgrade want install/upgrade upstart, when there is no newer version?
-
Klaus
_______________________________________________
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@xxxxxxxxx
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
