On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Mark <wolfmane@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Funny, so I have a non-existent OpenMoko[1] device :)
[1] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo_FreeRunner
Best,
--
Valério Valério
http://www.valeriovalerio.org
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Jamie Bennett<jamie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Apparently so...
>
>
> I must of missed where 'Nokia Employees' hinted at June next year.
>
OK, so you're saying that a beta SDK means impending device release?
> I base my guess on a _beta_ SDK in practical feature freeze, an October
> summit with high levels of device information expectations, various
> community projects maturing on the Fremantle SDK and the fact that Nokia
> employees have been working on the new device for quite some time now.
>
Doesn't seem likely to me...
For the same reason that OpenMoko announced a device to be released in
>
> Why would Nokia announce at OSiM last year a device that wouldn't be
> available for 20+ months later?
2007 that _still_ doesn't exist...
Funny, so I have a non-existent OpenMoko[1] device :)
[1] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo_FreeRunner
Best,
--
Valério Valério
http://www.valeriovalerio.org
They aren't freezing "the software", they're freezing the *development
> It's not in their interests to have a device
> development in public that long. Also why would they effectivly freeze the
> new software a year before it is released? Doesn't make sense does it.
>
environment* that is needed to create the software. What part of that
do you not understand?
Mark
_______________________________________________
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@xxxxxxxxx
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
_______________________________________________ maemo-users mailing list maemo-users@xxxxxxxxx https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users