new N810: oversized partition on internal card straight from factory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14/02/2008, Christian Otto Stelter <cosinus at unit42.de> wrote:
>  Frantisek Dufka wrote:
> > See http://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2940 for details
>  >
>  > Is this known issue of some batches? Also this brings interesting
>  > question - is this only a bug or are some eMMC chips in some N810
>  > devices really slightly bigger than in others?
>  >
>  > Anyone noticed it too? How big your internal card is (cat /proc/partitions)?
>
> Aye. This is what I get:
>
>  [   11.960937] attempt to access beyond end of device
>  [   11.960937] mmcblk1: rw=0, want=4013848, limit=3932160
>  [   11.960937] Buffer I/O error on device mmcblk1p1, logical block 501728
>  [   11.960937] attempt to access beyond end of device
>  [   11.960937] mmcblk1: rw=0, want=4013848, limit=3932160
>  [   11.960937] Buffer I/O error on device mmcblk1p1, logical block 501728
>  [   11.960937] attempt to access beyond end of device
>  [   11.960937] mmcblk1: rw=0, want=4014080, limit=3932160
>
>  every time I boot my device.

I started looking for this a few months ago after I had a problem
mounting the partition via my USB cable.  On multiple USB hosts I saw
similar whining in syslog, but the complaints were the same across
systems that mounted it successfully and those that didn't.

I *think* the errors were prompted by this:

I'd just deleted the AV media that comes bundled on the device via the
USB connection, and noticed that a "df" gave me the same output as
before deleting the media.  I then tried disconnecting the USB cable
and reconnecting it: that's when I saw these sort of errors on the
host.  It was only at this point that I started looking at the
tablet's dmesg output: it's possible it was complaining in this
fashion /before/ I removed the media (but I don't think it was).

I wonder if the bundled media files are originally placed in some
special part of the internal card that's thought of as immutable by
some code, but not all? </wild_ass_guess>

Jonathan
-- 
Jonathan Matthews | matthewslevine at gmail.com | 07790 195 895
  "That sounds vaguely obscene, and if there's one thing I
  cannot *stand*, it's vagueness." -- Dean Grennell


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]    

  Powered by Linux