Hi, Pretty much on spot. No silent updates. For critical updates a new flashable image would be released. Obviously this is far from end-user's optimal solution and a better solution is in the works but not deployed yet. Br, --jakub > >I would doubt any updates are silent. > >These kinds of updates must be visible to end user so I would >assume AppManager...but this only shows apps needing >updating...not low level cruft. > >So perhaps user would need to be instructed to switch to red >pill mode temporarily to get a certain lib or whatnot. > >Then again nokia could certainly pkg fixes as a 1st class app >and not require red pill...which is what they would prob' have >to do for ease of use in general. For critical updates I would >have to assume user wouldn't need red pill. > >I am not most knowledgeable on this matter though...speculation. > > >mike >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: weird? problem with memory reporting after >firmware upgrade >> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:01:26 -0400 >> From: Acadia Secure Networks <acadiasecurenets at aol.com> >> Reply-To: acadiasecurenets at aol.com >> Organization: Acadia Secure Networks >> To: Mike Klein <mklein at vxappliance.com> >> References: <4693D91F.4090008 at vxappliance.com> >> <f7106u$kg8$1 at sea.gmane.org> <46940BCA.6080704 at vxappliance.com> >> >> >> >> Mike, >> >> how does Nokia incorporate/distribute bug fixes in between releases >> like the one which just occurred? >> >> Are bug fixes silently downloaded/installed automatically or >does the >> user have to take some action to install them, for example, by means >> of a special repository for Nokia bug fixes? How can I tell if I am >> getting the bug fixes in the Nokia firmware? >> >> >> Best Regards, >> >> >> >> John Holmblad >> >> >> >> Acadia Secure Networks >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Mike Klein wrote: >> >>> I'll be a good boy and starting visiting bug system from now on. >>> >>> I updated bug descr to indicate latest firmware still has >>> problem...it seems fix was applied 2 days before release of >firmware >>> (something like that) so I doubt it is in. >>> >>> Hopefully this is visual only and doesn't cause errors when you get >>> close to actual limits. >>> >>> >>> mike >>> >>> Neil MacLeod wrote: >>> >>>> Mike Klein wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> My memory usage was at 70% after loading all this stuff >per control >>>>> panel. I recalled thinking this was good as I had put damn near >>>>> everything I wanted and still had breathing room. >>>>> >>>>> I check this morning memory settings and I see I'm at 27% usage?!? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Have you checked bug 1114[1] - it could be what you are >describing. >>>> From the vague and confusing comments left in the bug by >Nokia/Maemo >>>> it's hard to say if it's fixed in this firmware or not, but the >>>> chances are it's not (I mean, what was?) >>>> >>>> 1. https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1114 >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> maemo-users mailing list >>>> maemo-users at maemo.org >>>> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users >>>> >>>> >>> >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> --- >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> maemo-users mailing list >>> maemo-users at maemo.org >>> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> maemo-users mailing list >> maemo-users at maemo.org >> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users >> >_______________________________________________ >maemo-users mailing list >maemo-users at maemo.org >https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users >
