Bradley Whittington <maemo-users at radbrad.rucus.net> writes: > This may have been discussed before, but is there any reason why the default > reply is not to the list? it makes discussion on the list quite annoying. You're using mutt. From its manual: Mutt has a few nice features for handling mailing lists. In order to take advantage of them, you must specify which addresses belong to mailing lists, and which mailing lists you are subscribed to. Once you have done this, the list-reply function will work for all known lists. > Just wondering if there is a reason, or if thats how it was initially > configured, and no one has changed it? Again, from the above manual: The other method some mailing list admins use is to generate a ``Reply-To'' field which points back to the mailing list address rather than the author of the message. This can create problems when trying to reply directly to the author in private, since most mail clients will automatically reply to the address given in the ``Reply-To'' field. -hcz
