> in my opinion it would be a big mistake on Nokia's part to support > only 802.11b and not 802.11g as well. Also the 770 would have to > support, at a minimum,? Wireless Protected Access (WPA) if not > WPA2/802.11i? in order for the 770 to be viable in the market given > the well known exploits against the older Wired Equivalent Privacy > (WEP) security standard. I wholeheartedly agree. It must support WPA, and 802g would be a major selling point. No other PDA can do that right now. With the computer stores pushing 802.11n and WiMax being the buzzword right now, 802.11b seems so antiquated by comparison. As a current Tapwave Zodiac user with the SanDisk 802.11b wireless SD card, and there are many with equivalent setups, there isn't a very compelling reason to make the switch to the 770. The zodiac has a 216Mhz processor, a dedicated video processor, and has 128Mb onboard memory. The Nokia 770 doesn't compare well to the current Palms when looking at hardware specs. One way that Nokia can set the device apart is to include the faster networking technology. No current Palms or PPCs have 802.11g built in. My $.02 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 1144 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-users/attachments/20050810/8489ce23/attachment.bin
