On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 03:57:07PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 2:56 PM Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Fir the following compilation warnings:
> > 1031 | INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE void udp_v6_early_demux(struct sk_buff *skb)
> >
> > net/ipv6/ip6_offload.c:182:41: warning: no previous prototype for ‘ipv6_gro_receive’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > 182 | INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE struct sk_buff *ipv6_gro_receive(struct list_head *head,
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > net/ipv6/ip6_offload.c:320:29: warning: no previous prototype for ‘ipv6_gro_complete’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > 320 | INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE int ipv6_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhoff)
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > net/ipv6/ip6_offload.c:182:41: warning: no previous prototype for ‘ipv6_gro_receive’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > 182 | INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE struct sk_buff *ipv6_gro_receive(struct list_head *head,
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > net/ipv6/ip6_offload.c:320:29: warning: no previous prototype for ‘ipv6_gro_complete’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > 320 | INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE int ipv6_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhoff)
> >
> > Fixes: aaa5d90b395a ("net: use indirect call wrappers at GRO network layer")
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/net/ipv6.h | 3 +++
> > net/core/dev.c | 4 +---
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/ipv6.h b/include/net/ipv6.h
> > index bd1f396cc9c7..68676e6bd4b1 100644
> > --- a/include/net/ipv6.h
> > +++ b/include/net/ipv6.h
> > @@ -1265,4 +1265,7 @@ static inline void ip6_sock_set_recvpktinfo(struct sock *sk)
> > release_sock(sk);
> > }
> >
> > +INDIRECT_CALLABLE_DECLARE(struct sk_buff *ipv6_gro_receive(struct list_head *,
> > + struct sk_buff *));
> > +INDIRECT_CALLABLE_DECLARE(int ipv6_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *, int));
>
>
> I think we should move this to a new include file.
The ipv6_gro_* used in net/core/dev.c and net/ipv6/ip6_offload.c. This
left me with four options:
1. Use existing and already shared file - include/net/ipv6.h
2. Create new header and put it in net/, so include will be something
like that "../new_file.h".
3. Put new header in one of the folders or core/ or ipv6/.
4. Create new file in include/net just for those two lines.
I preferred option #1, which other option do you want me to redo?
>
> These declarations were static, and had to be made public only because
> of DIRECT call stuff,
> which is an implementation detail.
>
> Polluting include/net/ipv6.h seems not appropriate.
Thanks for the review.
