On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:16:47 +0300 Alexander Petrovsky <askjuise@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Oh, thanks. > > Where I can find out the full procedure? As this is a tool that is closely related to the kernel, I/we try to follow the kernel submitting patch guidelines, but losely: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html --Jesper > пт, 20 марта 2020 г. в 15:32, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > > On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:05:58 +0300 > > Alexander Petrovsky <askjuise@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > This micro ipvsadm patch fixes wrong (negative) FWMARK values > > > representation: > > > > > > # ipvsadm -L -f 2882430849 > > > Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags > > > -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn > > > FWM -1412536447 wlc > > > -> abc.my.host.net. Tunnel 1 0 0 > > > > > > > Hi Alexander, > > > > Your patch submission does not follow all the procedures, but given > > this is fairly trivial, and Julian didn't object, I went ahead and > > applied the patch with (your SoB and credit to you), here: > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/kernel/ipvsadm/ipvsadm.git/commit/?id=e61c8cdd1dcad > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Jesper Dangaard Brouer > > MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer > > > > -- > Alexander Petrovsky -- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
