On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 09:45:28PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote: > > Hello, > > On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > > I arranged the code so that the compiler can remove the unecessary bits > > in ip_vs_leave when CONFIG_SYSCTL is unset, and removed an explicit > > CONFIG_SYSCTL. > > > > Unfortunately when rebasing my work on top of that of Alex Gartrell I > > missed the fact that the newly added function ip_vs_addr_is_unicast was > > surrounded by CONFIG_SYSCTL. > > > > So remove the now unnecessary CONFIG_SYSCTL guards around > > ip_vs_addr_is_unicast. It is causing build failures today when > > CONFIG_SYSCTL is not selected and any self respecting compiler will > > notice that sysctl_cache_bypass is always false without CONFIG_SYSCTL > > and not include the logic from the function ip_vs_addr_is_unicast in > > the compiled code. > > > > Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> > > Simon, please apply to ipvs-next Thanks, applied. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
