Re: [PATCH 3.4.106] ipvs: rerouting to local clients is not needed anymore

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:56:12AM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> commit f5a41847acc5 ("ipvs: move ip_route_me_harder for ICMP")
> from 2.6.37 introduced ip_route_me_harder() call for responses to
> local clients, so that we can provide valid rt_src after SNAT.
> It was used by TCP to provide valid daddr for ip_send_reply().
> After commit 0a5ebb8000c5 ("ipv4: Pass explicit daddr arg to
> ip_send_reply()." from 3.0 this rerouting is not needed anymore
> and should be avoided, especially in LOCAL_IN.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>

Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Pablo, could you guide this into stable 3.4 ?

> ---
> 
> Pablo, this patch is a 3.4.106 version (same subject).
> 
>  net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
> index 00bdb1d..abdb475 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
> @@ -662,16 +662,24 @@ static inline int ip_vs_gather_frags_v6(struct sk_buff *skb, u_int32_t user)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> -static int ip_vs_route_me_harder(int af, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +static int ip_vs_route_me_harder(int af, struct sk_buff *skb,
> +				 unsigned int hooknum)
>  {
> +	if (!sysctl_snat_reroute(skb))
> +		return 0;
> +	/* Reroute replies only to remote clients (FORWARD and LOCAL_OUT) */
> +	if (NF_INET_LOCAL_IN == hooknum)
> +		return 0;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
>  	if (af == AF_INET6) {
> -		if (sysctl_snat_reroute(skb) && ip6_route_me_harder(skb) != 0)
> +		struct dst_entry *dst = skb_dst(skb);
> +
> +		if (dst->dev && !(dst->dev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK) &&
> +		    ip6_route_me_harder(skb) != 0)
>  			return 1;
>  	} else
>  #endif
> -		if ((sysctl_snat_reroute(skb) ||
> -		     skb_rtable(skb)->rt_flags & RTCF_LOCAL) &&
> +		if (!(skb_rtable(skb)->rt_flags & RTCF_LOCAL) &&
>  		    ip_route_me_harder(skb, RTN_LOCAL) != 0)
>  			return 1;
>  
> @@ -782,7 +790,8 @@ static int handle_response_icmp(int af, struct sk_buff *skb,
>  				union nf_inet_addr *snet,
>  				__u8 protocol, struct ip_vs_conn *cp,
>  				struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
> -				unsigned int offset, unsigned int ihl)
> +				unsigned int offset, unsigned int ihl,
> +				unsigned int hooknum)
>  {
>  	unsigned int verdict = NF_DROP;
>  
> @@ -812,7 +821,7 @@ static int handle_response_icmp(int af, struct sk_buff *skb,
>  #endif
>  		ip_vs_nat_icmp(skb, pp, cp, 1);
>  
> -	if (ip_vs_route_me_harder(af, skb))
> +	if (ip_vs_route_me_harder(af, skb, hooknum))
>  		goto out;
>  
>  	/* do the statistics and put it back */
> @@ -908,7 +917,7 @@ static int ip_vs_out_icmp(struct sk_buff *skb, int *related,
>  
>  	snet.ip = iph->saddr;
>  	return handle_response_icmp(AF_INET, skb, &snet, cih->protocol, cp,
> -				    pp, offset, ihl);
> +				    pp, offset, ihl, hooknum);
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
> @@ -985,7 +994,8 @@ static int ip_vs_out_icmp_v6(struct sk_buff *skb, int *related,
>  
>  	snet.in6 = iph->saddr;
>  	return handle_response_icmp(AF_INET6, skb, &snet, cih->nexthdr, cp,
> -				    pp, offset, sizeof(struct ipv6hdr));
> +				    pp, offset, sizeof(struct ipv6hdr),
> +				    hooknum);
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> @@ -1018,7 +1028,7 @@ static inline int is_tcp_reset(const struct sk_buff *skb, int nh_len)
>   */
>  static unsigned int
>  handle_response(int af, struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_proto_data *pd,
> -		struct ip_vs_conn *cp, int ihl)
> +		struct ip_vs_conn *cp, int ihl, unsigned int hooknum)
>  {
>  	struct ip_vs_protocol *pp = pd->pp;
>  
> @@ -1056,7 +1066,7 @@ handle_response(int af, struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_proto_data *pd,
>  	 * if it came from this machine itself.  So re-compute
>  	 * the routing information.
>  	 */
> -	if (ip_vs_route_me_harder(af, skb))
> +	if (ip_vs_route_me_harder(af, skb, hooknum))
>  		goto drop;
>  
>  	IP_VS_DBG_PKT(10, af, pp, skb, 0, "After SNAT");
> @@ -1169,7 +1179,7 @@ ip_vs_out(unsigned int hooknum, struct sk_buff *skb, int af)
>  	cp = pp->conn_out_get(af, skb, &iph, iph.len, 0);
>  
>  	if (likely(cp))
> -		return handle_response(af, skb, pd, cp, iph.len);
> +		return handle_response(af, skb, pd, cp, iph.len, hooknum);
>  	if (sysctl_nat_icmp_send(net) &&
>  	    (pp->protocol == IPPROTO_TCP ||
>  	     pp->protocol == IPPROTO_UDP ||
> -- 
> 1.9.3
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.Org]

  Powered by Linux