Hi,
On 07-01-2015 17:31, Julian Anastasov wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
On 06-01-2015 19:06, Julian Anastasov wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
if (!(flags & IP_VS_CONN_F_TEMPLATE)) {
cp = ip_vs_conn_in_get(param);
if (cp && ((cp->dport != dport) ||
!ip_vs_addr_equal(cp->daf, &cp->daddr,
daddr))) {
if (!(flags & IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE)) {
ip_vs_conn_expire_now(cp);
__ip_vs_conn_put(cp);
cp = NULL;
} else {
I assume we will not stop here sync for some connection that
was normally expired in master but was delayed in backup. TCP sync
starts for EST state, so I think it will hit the above case.
You mean that we could end up ignoring a sync msg that we shouldn't ignore?
Yes, that was my worry but I don't see how the code
can fail, so it looks fine to me.
Ok, cool. I'll do more tests and probably post this by next week.
Thanks Julian.
Regards,
Marcelo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
