From: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
The LBLC entries should use svc->af, not dest->af.
Needed to support svc->af != dest->af.
Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alex Gartrell <agartrell@xxxxxx>
---
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblc.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblc.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblc.c
index 547ff33..127f140 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblc.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblc.c
@@ -199,11 +199,11 @@ ip_vs_lblc_get(int af, struct ip_vs_lblc_table *tbl,
*/
static inline struct ip_vs_lblc_entry *
ip_vs_lblc_new(struct ip_vs_lblc_table *tbl, const union nf_inet_addr *daddr,
- struct ip_vs_dest *dest)
+ u16 af, struct ip_vs_dest *dest)
{
struct ip_vs_lblc_entry *en;
- en = ip_vs_lblc_get(dest->af, tbl, daddr);
+ en = ip_vs_lblc_get(af, tbl, daddr);
if (en) {
if (en->dest == dest)
return en;
@@ -213,8 +213,8 @@ ip_vs_lblc_new(struct ip_vs_lblc_table *tbl, const union nf_inet_addr *daddr,
if (!en)
return NULL;
- en->af = dest->af;
- ip_vs_addr_copy(dest->af, &en->addr, daddr);
+ en->af = af;
+ ip_vs_addr_copy(af, &en->addr, daddr);
en->lastuse = jiffies;
ip_vs_dest_hold(dest);
@@ -521,13 +521,13 @@ ip_vs_lblc_schedule(struct ip_vs_service *svc, const struct sk_buff *skb,
/* If we fail to create a cache entry, we'll just use the valid dest */
spin_lock_bh(&svc->sched_lock);
if (!tbl->dead)
- ip_vs_lblc_new(tbl, &iph->daddr, dest);
+ ip_vs_lblc_new(tbl, &iph->daddr, svc->af, dest);
spin_unlock_bh(&svc->sched_lock);
out:
IP_VS_DBG_BUF(6, "LBLC: destination IP address %s --> server %s:%d\n",
IP_VS_DBG_ADDR(svc->af, &iph->daddr),
- IP_VS_DBG_ADDR(svc->af, &dest->addr), ntohs(dest->port));
+ IP_VS_DBG_ADDR(dest->af, &dest->addr), ntohs(dest->port));
return dest;
}
--
1.8.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
