Hello, On Tue, 15 Jul 2014, Alex Gartrell wrote: > Previously, only the four high bits of the tclass were maintained in the > ipv6 case. This matches the behavior of ipv4, though whether or not we > should reflect ECN bits may be up for debate. Agreed, RFC 3168 9.1 has some recommendations and more changes may be needed, eg. by using INET_ECN_encapsulate as in other tunnels: ip6_flow_hdr(iph, INET_ECN_encapsulate(inner_dsfield, inner_dsfield), 0); > Signed-off-by: Alex Gartrell <agartrell@xxxxxx> So far, Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> > --- > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c > index c47444e..28ee592 100644 > --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c > +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c > @@ -967,8 +967,8 @@ ip_vs_tunnel_xmit_v6(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_conn *cp, > iph->nexthdr = IPPROTO_IPV6; > iph->payload_len = old_iph->payload_len; > be16_add_cpu(&iph->payload_len, sizeof(*old_iph)); > - iph->priority = old_iph->priority; > memset(&iph->flow_lbl, 0, sizeof(iph->flow_lbl)); > + ipv6_change_dsfield(iph, 0, ipv6_get_dsfield(old_iph)); > iph->daddr = cp->daddr.in6; > iph->saddr = saddr; > iph->hop_limit = old_iph->hop_limit; > -- > 1.8.1 Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
