From: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:31:06 +0300 (EEST) > Thanks for the review! I don't mind too about > removing rt6_nexthop. For me it is 51% against 49% to keep it > as it denotes the places that use nexthop and not gateway. > May be more opinions will help to decide because I don't know > if there are any plans to use similar techniques as done for IPv4. I have no strong opinion about removing rt6_nexthop. If it is of low cost today and makes the code easier to undersand and grep, just leave it alone. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
