On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:52:14PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote: > > Hello, > > On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > > I can enqueue this fix to nf if you like. No need to resend, I can > > manually apply. > > > > Let me know. > > It is not critical. I waited weeks the net tree to be > copied into net-next because it collides with the recent > "ipvs: make the service replacement more robust" change in > net tree :) But if a rcu_barrier in the netns cleanup looks > scary enough you can push it to nf. IMHO, it just adds > unneeded delay there. If it is not critical I would prefer for it to travel through nf-next. Though I do not feel strongly about this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
