Hello,
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Simon Horman wrote:
> In v3.9 6fd6ce2056de2709 ("ipv6: Do not depend on rt->n in
> ip6_finish_output2()") changed the behaviour of ip6_finish_output2()
> such that it creates and uses a neigh entry if none is found.
> Subsequently the 'n' field was removed from struct rt6_info.
Similar change in IPv4 opened the Pandora box:
IPVS, xt_TEE, raw.c (IP_HDRINCL). May be the corrsponding
places in IPv6 have the same problem.
I don't know the IPv6 routing but if we find a way
to keep the desired nexthop in rt6i_gateway and to add
RTF_GATEWAY checks here and there such solution would be more
general. FLOWI_FLAG_KNOWN_NH flag can help, if needed.
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
