On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 07:49:35AM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote: > > Hello, > > On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:08:07AM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote: > > > Convert the SCTP state table, so that it is more readable. > > > Change the states to be according to the diagram in RFC 2960 > > > and add more states suitable for middle box. Still, such > > > change in states adds incompatibility if systems in sync > > > setup include this change and others do not include it. > > > > > > With this change we also have proper transitions in INPUT-ONLY > > > mode (DR/TUN) where we see packets only from client. Now > > > we should not switch to 10-second CLOSED state at a time > > > when we should stay in ESTABLISHED state. > > > > > > The short names for states are because we have 16-char space > > > in ipvsadm and 11-char limit for the connection list format. > > > It is a sequence of the TCP implementation where the longest > > > state name is ESTABLISHED. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> > > > > Hi Julian, > > > > I am having trouble applying the first ip_vs_proto_sctp.c hunk. > > > > I have tried against net-next, nf-next and ipvs-next. > > Could you rebase it on the later and repost it with the second patch of > > this series? > > I forgot to mention that this patchset follows the > "ipvs: sloppy TCP and SCTP" change from Alexander Frolkin > posted on June 13. Our plans are for following list: > > 1. ipvs: sloppy TCP and SCTP (posted by Alexander and acked by me) > 2. ipvs: provide iph to schedulers (just applied by you) > 3. SH changes by Alexander (to be posted officially) depend > on 1 and 2 while SCTP patchset by me depends only on 1. > 4. Changes to sync only persistent conns (only in my head - TODO) > > Let me know if you can apply (1) to -next before the > SCTP patchset (its patch 2+3), it does not collide with (2), > I think. Thanks, and sorry for being a bit slow. Pablo has accepted patch 1 into his nf tree via my ipvs tree. At this stage I expect it to show up in net and v3.10. I have queued-up the remaining patches that you list above to ipvs-next and pushed it. I'll send a pull request to Pablo in the not to distant future. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
