Hello, On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Alexander Frolkin wrote: > diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c > index 8646488..9b1867b 100644 > --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c > +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ sctp_conn_schedule(int af, struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_proto_data *pd, > { > struct net *net; > struct ip_vs_service *svc; > + struct netns_ipvs *ipvs; > sctp_chunkhdr_t _schunkh, *sch; > sctp_sctphdr_t *sh, _sctph; > > @@ -27,13 +28,15 @@ sctp_conn_schedule(int af, struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_proto_data *pd, > if (sch == NULL) > return 0; > net = skb_net(skb); > + ipvs = net_ipvs(net); > rcu_read_lock(); > - if ((sch->type == SCTP_CID_INIT) && > + if ((sysctl_sloppy_sctp(ipvs) || > + (sch->type == SCTP_CID_INIT)) && Above change can be (all on same line): - if ((sch->type == SCTP_CID_INIT) && + if ((sysctl_sloppy_sctp(ipvs) || sch->type == SCTP_CID_INIT) && > I haven't touched the SCTP state tables yet. Here is the SCTP part we can use: diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c index 8646488..ae61212 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c @@ -232,21 +234,21 @@ static struct ipvs_sctp_nextstate * STATE : IP_VS_SCTP_S_NONE */ /*next state *//*event */ - {{IP_VS_SCTP_S_CLOSED /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_DATA_CLI */ }, + {{IP_VS_SCTP_S_ESTABLISHED /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_DATA_CLI */ }, {IP_VS_SCTP_S_CLOSED /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_DATA_SER */ }, {IP_VS_SCTP_S_INIT_CLI /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_INIT_CLI */ }, {IP_VS_SCTP_S_INIT_SER /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_INIT_SER */ }, - {IP_VS_SCTP_S_CLOSED /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_INIT_ACK_CLI */ }, + {IP_VS_SCTP_S_INIT_ACK_CLI /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_INIT_ACK_CLI */ }, {IP_VS_SCTP_S_CLOSED /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_INIT_ACK_SER */ }, - {IP_VS_SCTP_S_CLOSED /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_COOKIE_ECHO_CLI */ }, + {IP_VS_SCTP_S_ECHO_CLI /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_COOKIE_ECHO_CLI */ }, {IP_VS_SCTP_S_CLOSED /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_COOKIE_ECHO_SER */ }, - {IP_VS_SCTP_S_CLOSED /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_COOKIE_ACK_CLI */ }, + {IP_VS_SCTP_S_ESTABLISHED /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_COOKIE_ACK_CLI */ }, {IP_VS_SCTP_S_CLOSED /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_COOKIE_ACK_SER */ }, {IP_VS_SCTP_S_CLOSED /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_ABORT_CLI */ }, {IP_VS_SCTP_S_CLOSED /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_ABORT_SER */ }, - {IP_VS_SCTP_S_CLOSED /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_SHUT_CLI */ }, + {IP_VS_SCTP_S_SHUT_CLI /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_SHUT_CLI */ }, {IP_VS_SCTP_S_CLOSED /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_SHUT_SER */ }, - {IP_VS_SCTP_S_CLOSED /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_SHUT_ACK_CLI */ }, + {IP_VS_SCTP_S_SHUT_ACK_CLI /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_SHUT_ACK_CLI */ }, {IP_VS_SCTP_S_CLOSED /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_SHUT_ACK_SER */ }, {IP_VS_SCTP_S_CLOSED /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_SHUT_COM_CLI */ }, {IP_VS_SCTP_S_CLOSED /* IP_VS_SCTP_EVE_SHUT_COM_SER */ }, You can continue with an official submission with all these changes. Subject should be in such format: [PATCH] ipvs: ... You can check Documentation/SubmittingPatches For example: [PATCH] ipvs: sloppy TCP and SCTP Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html