>---- Original Message ---- >From: Stefan Bauer <stefan.bauer@xxxxxxxxxxx> >To: "lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Sent: Tue, Feb 5, 2013, 2:29 PM >Subject: AW: How does the mode fullnat work in detail and is implemented? > >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >Von: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > I'm more than happy to get this informations. thank you. So the initial >> patches are not used in the mainline kernel hence can be seen as obsolete. Also >> the patches for ipvsadm are useless as its used with the regular NAT mode. >> >> Yes, AFIC that is correct. > >And through full-nat, the IPVS does not have to be the default gw in local network anymore correct? > >Furthermore, the IPVS itself can also host on the same machine a real-server right? Yes, but if you want a uniform configuration place IPVS into a network namespace (use LXC it makes life easier), then there is no diff in the configuration even if the RS runs on the same physical machine. This configuration might need more NIC:s or you can use macvlan or vlan depening on the traffic load. BR Hans Schillstrom -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
