On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:19:22AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>> From: Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> We met a kernel panic in 2.6.32.43 kernel:
> [...]
>> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c
>> index b20b29c..c2bc264 100644
>> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c
>> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c
>> @@ -65,8 +65,10 @@ static int ip_vs_ftp_pasv;
>> static int
>> ip_vs_ftp_init_conn(struct ip_vs_app *app, struct ip_vs_conn *cp)
>> {
>> + spin_lock(&cp->lock);
>> /* We use connection tracking for the command connection */
>> cp->flags |= IP_VS_CONN_F_NFCT;
>> + spin_unlock(&cp->lock);
>> return 0;
>
> The conntrack support for FTP IPVS helper seems to be there since
> 2.6.37.
>
> However, the patch description mentions 2.6.32.43.
>
> Something doesn't match here, could you clarify this?
>
Sorry for the misleading description in the patch. We found the panic
in 2.6.32.43 is caused by changing cp->flags without protection. In
2.6.32.43, ip_vs_process_message changes cp->flags without protection
while update active/inactive flags for the connection.
After code inspiration, we found in 3.x kernel, it is accidentally
fixed by commit f73181c. But with ip_vs_app changes,
ip_vs_ftp_init_conn() will have chance to change cp->flags without
protection. So it is a potential bug in 3.x kernel.
> Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
