On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:10:41AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 07:47 +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote: > > Change order of init so netns init is ready > > when register ioctl and netlink. > > > > Ver2 > > Whitespace fixes and __init added. > > > > Reported-by: "Ryan O'Hara" <rohara@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Looks good, interdiff says you fixed up things, and I have tested it > against the net tree, good work :-) > > Is this a stable tree candidate? Yes, I think so. I now have the following 7 changes in my ipvs tree on kernel.org. The last two are already in Pablo's net tree and I intend to send a pull request for the remaining 5 soon. It is my opinion that all 7 patches are stable tree material. ipvs: kernel oops - do_ip_vs_get_ctl ipvs: take care of return value from protocol init_netns ipvs: null check of net->ipvs in lblc(r) shedulers ipvs: reset ipvs pointer in netns ipvs: add check in ftp for initialized core ipvs: fix crash in ip_vs_control_net_cleanup on unload ipvs: Verify that IP_VS protocol has been registered -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
