Re: [PATCH 1/6] ipvs: timeout tables do not need GFP_ATOMIC allocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:14:19PM +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
> Hello
> All 6 patches look fine to me, and are all called from process context
> 
> >---- Original Message ----
> >From: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
> >To: "Simon Horman" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Sent: Fri, Apr 13, 2012, 3:49 PM
> >Subject: [PATCH 1/6] ipvs: timeout tables do not need GFP_ATOMIC allocation
> >
> >They are called only on initialization.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hans Schillstrom <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, I have applied these to my ipvs-next tree which I will push
to kernel.org shortly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.Org]

  Powered by Linux