On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:14:19PM +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote: > Hello > All 6 patches look fine to me, and are all called from process context > > >---- Original Message ---- > >From: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> > >To: "Simon Horman" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Cc: lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >Sent: Fri, Apr 13, 2012, 3:49 PM > >Subject: [PATCH 1/6] ipvs: timeout tables do not need GFP_ATOMIC allocation > > > >They are called only on initialization. > > > >Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Hans Schillstrom <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, I have applied these to my ipvs-next tree which I will push to kernel.org shortly. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
