No problem, I'll send out the new patch now. Thanks! On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 09:40:09AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 10:24:09AM -0500, Mike Maxim wrote: >> > The reason I put that in is because the size of that table becomes >> > more relevant/important if you decide to use the weights in the manner >> > the patch lets you. It would be conceivable that someone might need to >> > increase the size of that table to accommodate their configuration, so >> > I thought it would be handy to be able to do that through the regular >> > configuration system instead of editing the source. >> >> Hi Mike, >> >> I agree, but I think its also reasonable to consider IP_VS_SH_TAB_BITS as >> a separate change. >> >> Could you >> >> 1. Split the patch into a Kconfig patch and a ip_vs_sh.c patch >> 2. Remove spurious line additions from the resulting patches? > > Scratch that, please follow Pablo's request. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
