>Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011, 13:03 PM >Subject: Re: [v4 PATCH 1/6] IPVS: Change of socket usage to enable name space exit. > >On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 06:50:13PM +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote: >> To work this patch also needs the other patches in this series. > >Hi Hans, > >could you explain the implications statement above? >What kind of behaviour might I expect if only this patch is applied? Oops, left there by misstake. Can you remove that line before pushing it ? >I'm planning to push this and 2/6 for 2.6.39, and as we have >discussed (offline) that combination works. But from a bisection >point of view, this patch needs to not "blow up" if used by itself. It should not be any bisect. problems from what I can see. Regards Hans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
