Hello, On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
v2 PATCH 13/22 - ip_vs_est - estimation_timer: what protection is needed for for_each_net? It is rtnl for user context and RCU for softirq? May be est_timer must be per NS? Now may be rcu_read_lock is needed before for_each_net_rcu ? for_each_net can be called only under rtnl_lock?[snip] In case of a common timer for all ns: rcu_read_lock(); for_each_net_rcu(net) { ... } rcu_read_unlock(); I guess it's better with a timer per netns ?
Yes, I too have little preference for the per-ns timer.
(then for_each_net() is not needed, and the locking can remain the same as before the netns change.)
Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
