On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:51:58AM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote: > > Hello, > > On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Simon Horman wrote: > > >>>But dest could be created as part of failover and thus > >>>exist by the time any packets need to be forwarded, right? > >>> > >>>There are cases, such as where the backup is also a real-server > >>>that its rather inconvenient for svc and dst to exist while > >>>synchronisation information is being received. > >> > >> OK, then we should not reach request_module, > >>new arg to ip_vs_pe_get() can specify that we call it > >>from interrupt, so the PE must be already loaded as module. > >>Then cp->pe can hold the reference to PE until > >>we bind the template to svc and dest where svc->pe > >>should be compared to ct->pe. ct->pe is needed only > >>for this purpose because later it can be determined > >>from svc. > > > >Do you have a preference for this approach > >over making ip_vs_pe_sip non-modular? > > We already decided about "IPVS: Add persistence engine to > connection entry", so cp->pe should be attached to backup > and I hope Hans will add checks for same PE in ip_vs_find_dest > and ip_vs_try_bind_dest. Then the only problem remains > to change code so that request_module is not called by > softirq. If the svc is not created yet in backup to > load the PE module, it must be loaded manually to > allow connections with PE to be created. If you still > prefer to see some code I have to create fresh tree later > today. May be if Hans uses ip_vs_pe_getbyname instead of > ip_vs_pe_get that should solve the request_module problem. I changed things around a bit in "IPVS: Add persistence engine to connection entry". ip_vs_pe_getbyname() became __ip_vs_pe_getbyname() ip_vs_pe_get() became ip_vs_pe_getbyname() And ip_vs_pe_get() now just takes a reference on the module if its loaded. So yes I agree, except that __ip_vs_pe_getbyname() is the name of the function that should be called, which needs to be made un-static and possibly renamed (again). Also, to __ip_vs_pe_getbyname() calls try_module_get(). Is that safe from interrupt context? > What should we do if PE module is not loaded > while we are creating connection in backup? We can not > load modules, may be when connection is bound to > dest+svc we should inherit the PE from svc->pe ? If the modules isn't loaded, then svc->pe can't be non-NULL, right? > May be using request_module_nowait is not an option > because we risk to try forever if module is not > present. That does not sound desirable. > >> But I see another problem which is not backup > >> specific: how ip_vs_sip_ct_match knows that ct->pe_data > >> is created by ip_vs_sip_fill_param and not by another PE? > >> We need to compare p->pe with cp->pe in ip_vs_ct_in_get > >> before calling ct_match. > > > > Yes, I agree that is a problem. > > > > In practice it won't be affecting anyone at this time > > as there is only one pe. > > > > How about this, which applies on top of > > "IPVS: Add persistence engine to connection entry". > > Yes, it is fine Thanks. I have pushed "IPVS: Add persistence engine to connection entry", the change below, and a few other (unrelated) changes that I have been sitting on into a staging branch of lvs-test-2.6. I may rebase the staging branch - by which I mean its intended to be a transient branch - but I figure its better than nothing. > Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> > > > From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: IPVS: Only match pe_data created by the same pe > > > > Only match persistence engine data if it was > > created by the same persistence engine. > > > > Reported-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Index: lvs-test-2.6/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c > > =================================================================== > > --- lvs-test-2.6.orig/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c 2010-11-08 15:18:57.000000000 +0900 > > +++ lvs-test-2.6/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c 2010-11-08 15:19:02.000000000 +0900 > > @@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ struct ip_vs_conn *ip_vs_ct_in_get(const > > > > list_for_each_entry(cp, &ip_vs_conn_tab[hash], c_list) { > > if (p->pe_data && p->pe->ct_match) { > > - if (p->pe->ct_match(p, cp)) > > + if (p->pe == cp->pe && p->pe->ct_match(p, cp)) > > goto out; > > continue; > > } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html