Le jeudi 21 octobre 2010 Ã 08:16 -0700, Paul E. McKenney a Ãcrit :
> Here is what it looks like in my -rcu tree:
>
> void __rcu_read_lock(void)
> {
> current->rcu_read_lock_nesting++;
> barrier(); /* needed if we ever invoke rcu_read_lock in rcutree.c */
> }
>
> So yes, I finally did convince myself that the ACCESS_ONCE was not
> needed. ;-)
>
> This is not yet in mainline, but Ingo sent the series containing this
> commit (80dcf60e) to Linus earlier today, so there is hope!
>
Excellent, thanks for taking time to clarify this Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
